© 1927 by Biometrika Trust
Errata et Corrigenda |
Errata et Corrigenda
By an errorthe value is correct in the original manuscript217N has been printed for 271N in the numerator of the third expression in the coefficient of
in Volue of 2M4 on p. 382 of Mr Church's paper in Vol. XVIII. The correct value is given in the first line on p. 380. The owners of VoL XVIII are requested to make this correction in the text. Several rather puzzling slips were overlooked in the proof of B. G. E. Hooke's paper on the Farringdon Street Crania. They occur in the "Remarks" in the Sheets of Measurements facing p. 54 of VoL XVIII.
Sheet I. Skull No. 33 : For "Pars-ocdpital15 read" "Par-occipitaL"
Sheet I. Skull No. 44: Read "Sylvian groove" for "spheno-parietal sulcus."
Sheet II. Skull No. 48: "Accessory cusp on 1st molar," this is a fifth cusp.
Sheet II. Skull No. 50: The tiny ossicles are at junction of anterior (not ante) and middle thirds, La in region of metopic fontanelle.
Sheet II. Skull No. 55: For "super-mastoid" read "supra-mastoid."
Sheet II. Skull No. 62: For "spheno-parietal sulcus" read "Sylvian groove."
Sheet II. Skull No. 67: For "petro-mastoid process" read "retro-mastoid process" (on inner side of mastoidal groove).
Sheet II. Skull No. 70: For "pterygo-apinus1" read "pterygo-spinous."
Sheet II. Skull No. 75: Read again "supra-mastoid" for "super-mastoid."
Sheet III. Skull No. 197: For "lacrimalis" read "lacrymalis."
Sheet III. Skull No. 198: The "transverse bridge on foramen" alluded to here will be found elucidated in the Remarks on Skull No. 187.
Sheet IV. Skull No. 211: "Posterior interparietal bone," cancel this and replace by "ossicle of
."
Sheet V. Skull No. 100: "petro-mastoid" should be "retro-mastoid."
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Aldrich Keynes among the Statisticians History of Political Economy, January 1, 2008; 40(2): 265 - 316. [PDF] |
||||
